Modularized electrochemical cell system

ABSTRACT

An electrochemical cell system including a plurality of electrochemical cells arranged in an electrochemical cell stack, the stack including a plurality of substacks configured such that fluid flows in series from substack to substack, a first electrical control device coupled to a first substack and a second electrical control device coupled to a second substack, wherein the first electrical control device is controllable independently of the second control device to selectively electrically configure the first and second substacks.

FIELD

The present patent application relates to electrochemical cells, such asfuel cells and electrolysis cells, and, more particularly, toelectrochemical cell stacks that have been modularized into substacks.

BACKGROUND

An electrochemical cell includes an anode, a cathode and an electrolyte.Reactants at the anode and cathode react and ions move across theelectrolyte while electrons move through an external electrical circuitto form a completed electrochemical reaction across the cell.

An electrochemical cell can be designed to operate only as a fuel cell,where electrical power and heat are output from the electrochemicalreaction with fuel and oxidizer as input reactants, or only as anelectrolyzer, where input power and reactant (water), and possibly inputheat, electrochemically react to produce hydrogen and oxygen, or as adual purpose electrochemical cell capable of switching between fuel celland electrolysis modes. Electrolyzer cells operate electrochemically inreverse with respect to fuel cells.

There are multiple types of electrochemical cells which can operate asfuel cells and/or electrolyzers. Some of the most common types ofelectrochemical fuel cells are proton exchange membranes, solid oxide,molten carbonite, alkaline, and phosphoric acid.

There are many geometries possible for individual electrochemical cells,the two most common types being planar cells and tubular cells. Planarcells are where the cathode, electrolyte and anode are layered in aplanar geometry, and tubular cells are where the electrolyte is in atubular configuration with either the anode on the inside of the tubeand the cathode external or the cathode on the inside of the tube andthe anode external.

Multiple individual electrochemical cells can be configured electricallyin series to form a “stack” to match the voltage, power, and currentneeded for the desired application. For planar electrochemical celltechnology, the individual cells are stacked on top of each other withfluid separation plates in between and mechanically fastened together toform the stack of cells electrochemically in series. For tubularelectrochemical cell technology, the individual tubes are bundledtogether with the reactant flow usually shared between the tube inputsand electrical connections at the external outside and ends of thetubes.

Historically, the stack shares a single reactant flow input and outputpath. The number of cells in the electrochemical cell stack may beselected to provide the cell stack with the desired voltage, current,and power output/input range in response to reactants (i.e., fuel andoxidizer such as hydrogen and oxygen in fuel cell operation, or waterand heat in electrolysis operation) passing through the stack.

Stacks may be arranged electrically in parallel or in series with otherstacks to support larger power applications. Historically, stacks orsubportions of stacks are hardwired electrically into a setconfiguration

Historically, when an electrochemical cell stack is supporting a poweror load profile (load on a fuel cell or input power to an electrolyzer)that is changing, the entire stack is controlled as a single unitsharing equal load or power production supported by a shared reactantstream. All the cells in the stack historically are designed to operateat the same current density (amperes passing through a setelectrochemical cell surface area) to support the power or load profile.

An electrochemical cell operates along a performance curve, commonlycalled a polarization curve, inherent to each cell. The performancecurve dictates how the electrochemical cell voltage changes with thechange in current flowing through it.

FIG. 1 is an example proton exchange cell performance or polarizationcurve operating in fuel cell mode. FIG. 2 is the same example protonexchange cell performance or polarization curve operating inelectrolyzer mode. FIG. 3 is an example solid oxide cell performance orpolarization curve operating in electrolyzer mode.

In accordance with the electrochemical cell's polarization curve,voltage varies with the change of current density which corresponds todifferent power levels (input and output).

In a regenerative electrochemical cell's polarization curve, voltage canvary even more significantly between operation in fuel cell andelectrolysis mode (reference FIGS. 1 and 2). This difference iscompounded as the amount of cells in a stack increase. Thus, a powerdistribution and control system supporting a single electrochemical cellstack which operates in both fuel cell and electrolysis mode mustaccommodate a wider range of voltages associated with theelectrochemical cell stack.

Historically, to overcome the voltage differences between fuel cell andelectrolysis mode in a regenerative electrochemical cell stack, powerconverters have been used to either boost the output voltage or reducethe input voltage. However, power converters create an efficiency loss,add weight, increase system complexity, and present reliability issues.Another option is to use two separate stacks, one for the fuel cell modeand one for the electrolysis mode. However, additional fuel cell stacksincrease the overall weight of the application, present the need forthermal control of the non-operating stack, and introduce reliabilityissues due to the need for valves that switch between the two modes.

It is with respect to these considerations and others that thedisclosure made herein is presented.

SUMMARY

It should be appreciated that this Summary is provided to introduce aselection of concepts in a simplified form that are further describedbelow in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to beused to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.

Systems and methods described herein provide for the modularization ofan electrochemical cell to support more efficient and simplifiedoperations for fuel cell operation, electrolyzer operation, or aregenerative cell operation.

In one aspect, the disclosed electrochemical cell system may include aplurality of electrochemical cells arranged in an electrochemical cellstack, the electrochemical cell stack including a plurality ofsubstacks, a first electrical control device coupled to a firstsubstack, and a second electrical control device coupled to a secondsubstack.

It should be understood that reference herein to “first” and “second”substacks is not intended to convey any sort of spatial relationshipbetween the substacks. For example, the first and second substacks arenot necessarily positioned adjacent to each other.

In another aspect, the disclosed electrochemical cell system may includea plurality of electrochemical cells arranged in an electrochemical cellstack, the stack including a plurality of substacks configured such thatfluid flows in series from substack to substack, a first electricalcontrol device coupled to a first substack and a second electricalcontrol device coupled to a second substack, wherein the firstelectrical control device is controllable independently of the secondcontrol device to selectively configure the first and second substacks.

In another aspect, the disclosed electrochemical cell system may includemultiple electrical cells arranged into a stack, where the stack isdivided into at least two substacks. The cells in the substacks would beelectrically connected in series but the electrical configuration ofeach substack with the rest of the substacks would be controlled via aswitch, relay or similar electrical control device. All the substacks inthe stack could share the same reactant input flow which could becontrolled by a single source. Each substack or group of substacks inthe stack could be electrically switched on or off (i.e., opening orcompleting the circuit to not allow or allow electron flow) by controlof the electrical control device. Thus in this manner, some substackscould be switched off while other substacks in the stack remainoperating while at the same time adjusting the single reactant controlpoint to select proper operational points for the electrochemical cells.A modularized electrochemical cell stack as such could support a widerrange of output or input power while maintaining a more stableoperational voltage and cell performance range. The operatingsubstack(s) configuration could be easily be cycled to allow thermalcontrol of the whole stack, either by having cells upstream providewaste heat to the downstream cells or rotating substack operation socells do not cooldown. The electrochemical stack modularization couldalso allow, by means of the electrical control devices, theinstantaneous electrical reconfiguration of substacks or multiplesubstacks between electrical operation in parallel or series or acombination of the two, in order to more closely match a desired totalvoltage and power profile for a load or a power source. A more stablevoltage performance range, either by modifying the number of operatingsubstacks or by reconfiguring the substacks electrically between seriesand parallel, can eliminate the need for power regulation hardware andthe weight and efficiency losses associated with it.

In another aspect, the disclosed electrochemical cell system may includeat least two electrochemical cell stacks, each of the stacks including aplurality of electrochemical cells arranged into a plurality ofsubstacks such that fluid flows in series from substack to substack,wherein each substack of one of the stacks is electrically coupled inseries with at least one substack of the other stacks to define at leasttwo rows of substacks, and at least two electrical control devices, eachof the electrical control devices being electrically coupled to anassociated one of the rows of substacks.

In another aspect, the disclosed electrochemical cell system may includeat least two electrochemical cell stacks, with each electrochemical cellstack including a plurality of electrochemical cells arranged into atleast two substacks. The electrochemical cells in the substacks could bein an electrically fixed configuration, such as in series, in parallel,or in a combination of both, but individual substack's or group ofsubstacks' electrical configuration with the remaining system substackscould be controlled via a switch, relay, or similar electrical controldevice. Each stack could operate with a shared reactant flow in seriesfrom substack to substack. The plurality of stacks could also operatewith a shared reactant flow in parallel with other stacks so as to allowuniform flow to the stacks with a single fluid flow control point. In amultiple stack configuration, the electrical configuration of substacksor substack groups among multiple stacks could be switched in series orin parallel, or activated or deactivated as required to support theelectrochemical cell thermally and specifically support the desiredpower attributes and performance ranges of the application.

Other aspects of the disclosed modularized electrochemical cell systemwill become apparent from the following description, the accompanyingdrawings and the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graphical illustration of average cell voltage versuscurrent density of an example proton exchange cell operating in fuelcell mode, wherein the data for the curve was originally published inNASA document NASA/TM-2006-214054 “Round Trip Energy Efficiency of NASAGlenn Regenerative Fuel Cell System”, by Garcia, Chang, Johnson, Bents,Scullin, and Jakupca;

FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of average cell voltage versuscurrent density of the same example proton exchange cell operating inelectrolyzer mode;

FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration of voltage versus current density ofan example solid oxide cell operation in electrolysis mode, wherein thecurve was originally published by Dr. Steve Herring at Idaho NationalLaboratory, May 19, 2009 as part of the “High Temperature ElectrolysisSystem” presentation (project ID #PD_(—)14_Herring) for the USDepartment of Energy Hydrogen Program;

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of one aspect of the disclosed modularizedelectrochemical cell system; and

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of another aspect of the disclosedmodularized electrochemical cell system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure provides for modularization of electrochemicalcell stacks, such as fuel cell stacks, electrolysis cell stacks, whilethe substacks' electrical configuration, such as electrical operation inparallel, series, open circuit, or a combination thereof, is able to bemodified individually or in groups by means of electrical controldevices, such as switches or relays, to support changes in system poweror performance, as shown in FIG. 4. It is believed that such aconfiguration provides reliable switching of the electrochemicalsubstacks such that the overall system can more simply support a widerrange of voltage and power inputs and outputs, providing higherperformance and system control in both fuel cell and/or electrolyzermodes. This modularization configuration can also provide a morecontrolled or stable electrochemical cell operation by allowing theindividual cells to operate over a smaller performance or currentdensity range, while at the same time matching wider system voltages andpower input/outputs.

A modularized electrochemical cell stack can provides additional thermalbenefit for the stack when the reactant flow is in series from substackto substack, rather than in parallel among substacks. Although reactantflow in parallel through the electrochemical cells in the stack hasminimal negative effects when the substacks remain operating in asimilar manner, as when the substacks' electrical configuration ischanged from between series and parallel, it would result in increasedunutilized reactant flowing through the system when a substack is placedin an open circuit configuration. The unutilized reactant flow from thenon-operating substack would pass through the system and result ineither additional system efficiency loss or increased system hardwareneeded to process or recycle the additional unutilized reactant. Anotheraspect of this disclosure is to design the electrochemical cell stacksuch that the reactant flows in series from substack to substack. Thisconfiguration of a modularized electrochemical cell stack has theadvantage of still maintaining a single stack input for flow controlwhile allowing the maximum amount of reactant to be utilized in thestack. The reactant flow in series from substack to substackconfiguration also allows for waste heat from electrochemical reactionsin upstream substacks to maintain the desired thermal environment forany non-operating substacks downstream, reducing or eliminating the needfor thermal control hardware. It should be understood that the reactantflow through the electrochemical cells within the substack could be inparallel, series, or a combination of both internal to the substack.

The disclosed modularized electrochemical stack design may assist inoperation of systems with a plurality of stacks. In such a system,reactant flow can be controlled from a single source and then flow isdiverted equally to the plurality of stacks. The plurality of stacks maybe modularized into individual controllable substacks, or by groups ofsubstacks across plural stacks, as shown in FIG. 5. A multiple stacksystem which employs the modularized system can allow simplified morereliable matching of power inputs or outputs without shutting down anentire stack and associated reactant flow. A modularized stack allowsinstantaneous electrochemical cell deactivation of part of the stack,while allowing other sections of the stack to operate, which caneliminate or greatly reduce the need for additional thermal control ofthe non-operating cells. Fluid reactant flow can be controlled at asimplified number of points with the flow diverted passively to theplurality of stacks. This allows the mechanical control hardware to besimplified and further removed from possible high temperatureelectrochemical cells, resulting in lower cost and more reliablehardware, as well as a simple and more reliable system.

The disclosed modularized electrochemical stack design may assist inoperation of regenerative electrochemical cell stacks that function inboth fuel cell and electrolyzer modes. In such a system, theconfiguration of substacks operating in series and in parallel can bemodified by means of the electrical control devices to match the desiredvoltage range.

The advantages of the disclosed modularized system is illustrated in theexample of a regenerative fuel cell/electrolyzer system. An exampleregenerative proton exchange membrane electrochemical stack has a totalof 34 cells divided into two substacks of 17 cells electrically inseries. As evident in the comparison of FIGS. 1 and 2, the voltage of anelectrochemical cell can vary significantly at different currentoperation points, which correspond to different power input and outputlevels. Using the example performance shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, operationin fuel cell mode at 300 A/cm2, each cell would be operating atapproximately 0.78V, resulting in a total substack voltage of 13.3V. Thesame individual cells operating in electrolysis mode at 300 A/cm2 wouldbe operating at approximately 1.64V, bringing the total substack voltageto 27.9V. By allowing the substacks to be electrically reconfigured byan electrical control device between fuel cell and electrolysisoperation, one could configure the substacks in series in fuel cell modeand in parallel in electrolysis mode, resulting in an operating voltageof 26.5V in fuel cell mode and 27.8V in electrolysis mode. However, in atraditional configuration, all 34 cells would be electrically“hardwired” in series with no electrical reconfiguration possible. Withthe same amount of cells (same power out) the traditional configurationof a single stack of 34 electrochemical cells in series would result inan operating voltage change from 26.5V in fuel cell mode versus 55.8V inelectrolysis mode. In this example, the power distribution system for amodularized configuration would have to accommodate a voltage range of27.8V to 26.5V (only a difference of 1.3V), which is within the standarddesign range of a 28V system per MIL-STD-704. In this example, thetraditional stack configuration would be forced to design for asignificantly wider voltage range of 26.5V to 55.8V, which is welloutside standard voltage ranges, and therefore implement a more complexpower distribution system design such as utilizing power converters,with their associated weight and efficiency loss, to keep the systemvoltage in a more manageable range. Whereas in a modularizedconfiguration the smaller voltage difference allows a simpler powerdistribution system design within standard voltage ranges withoutadditional power conversion or other associated equipment.

In another simplified example of the system, a group of electrolyzerstacks could be supporting a variable power input profile, such as inputfrom a solar power source for generating hydrogen. The solar profilechanges throughout the day as the sun rises, moves across the sky, andsets, resulting in a very large change in power input. In a traditionalsolid oxide stack configuration, entire stacks would be either turnedoff as the solar power decreases, resulting in more complex thermalcontrol systems to keep the non-operating stacks hot. Using amodularized configuration, a single substack of each stack could beoperated at daybreak and dusk, to produce a smaller amount of power at amore stable solid oxide cell operational range, while producing heat tothermally maintain the non-operating substacks. The amount ofoperational substacks in each stack could be increased by means of theelectrical control devices, and the reactant flow to the stacks could beincreased by means of the single (or reduced number of) fluid flowcontrol points to support the increased solar power available throughoutthe day while still maintaining a tighter current density operationalrange and therefore less impact to balance of plant hardware, systemdesign, and controls.

As shown in FIG. 4, one aspect of the disclosed modularizedelectrochemical cell system, generally designated 10, may include anelectrochemical cell stack 12 comprised of a number of electrochemicalcells, wherein the electrochemical cell stack 12 may be subdivided intoa number N of substacks 14, 16, 18. The substacks 14, 16, 18 may beelectrically coupled in series.

Electrical control devices 20, 22, 24 (e.g., switches) may beelectrically coupled to each substack 14, 16, 18 such that eachassociated substack 14, 16, 18 may be electrically reconfigured to aload or power source to operate in parallel or in series with the otherremaining substacks. The electrical control devices 20, 22, 24 coupledto each associated substack 14, 16, 18 can also electrically decouplethe substack from the load/source as desired.

The number of electrochemical cells and electrical configuration of thecells comprising the electrochemical cell stack 12 may be selected basedupon the type of electrochemical cell used and the desired output of thestack 12 (e.g., peak power output), among other factors. In one aspect,the electrochemical cells of the stack 12 may be fuel cells, such assolid oxide fuel cells. In another aspect, the electrochemical cells ofthe stack 12 may be electrolysis cells, which may be the same or similarto fuel cells. In yet another aspect, the electrochemical cells of thestack 12 may operate as both fuel cells and electrolysis cells.

The number N of substacks 14, 16, 18 in the electrochemical cell stack12 may be dictated by the total number of electrochemical cells in thestack 12, the desired operational cell performance range, thesurrounding system voltage requirements, as well as by otherconsiderations. For example, the number N of substacks 14, 16, 18 may bedictated by cost considerations that limit the total number ofelectrical switches 20, 22, 24 in the system 10.

The number and electrical configuration of electrochemical cells in eachsubstack 14, 16, 18 may be dictated by the total number ofelectrochemical cells in the stack 12, the type of electrochemical cellsbeing used, the desired output of the system 10, as well as otherconsiderations.

For example, a solid oxide cell stack operating as a fuel cell having 51total electrochemical cells may be divided into three substacks, whereineach substack has an associated electrical control device, and whereineach substack includes 17 individual electrochemical cells fixed inseries. However, it should be understood that these numbers are onlyexemplary, and that each substack of the system may have a differentnumber of cells as compared to the other substacks of the system, aswell as a different fixed electrical configuration of those cells.

Thus, fluid (e.g., fuel cell or electrolyzer reactants) may flow fromsubstack 18 to substacks 16 to substack 14 in series, as shown by arrowA, while each substack 14, 16, 18 may be electrically coupled to theload in parallel by way of the associated electrical control devices 20,22, 24. Furthermore, the voltage and power of the system 10 may bevaried by either electrically coupling or decoupling one or more of thesubstacks 14, 16, 18 from the load, or modifying the electricalconfiguration of the substacks from parallel to series by way of theassociated electrical switches 20, 22, 24

Referring to FIG. 5, another aspect of the disclosed modularizedelectrochemical cell system, generally designated 100, may include Xnumber of electrochemical cell stacks 102, 104, 106, each comprised of anumber of electrochemical cells. The electrochemical cells of eachelectrochemical cell stack 102, 104, 106 may be subdivided into Y numberof substacks 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124. It should beunderstood that different electrochemical cell stacks 102, 104, 106 mayhave a different number Y of substacks 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118,120, 122, 124. It should be understood that different electrochemicalcell substacks 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124 may have adifferent number of electrochemical cells and cell electricalconfigurations within the substacks.

At least two substacks 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124 fromeach electrochemical cell stack 102, 104, 106 may be electricallycoupled together in series to form a number of rows 126, 128, 130 ofsubstacks. For example, row 126 may include substack 108 fromelectrochemical cell stack 102, substack 114 from electrochemical cellstack 104 and substack 120 from electrochemical cell stack 106, row 128may include substack 110 from electrochemical cell stack 102, substack116 from electrochemical cell stack 104 and substack 122 fromelectrochemical cell stack 106, and row 130 may include substack 112from electrochemical cell stack 102, substack 118 from electrochemicalcell stack 104 and substack 124 from electrochemical cell stack 106. Asused herein, the word “row” broadly refers to the electrical coupling,in series, of substacks across multiple electrochemical cell stacks 102,104, 106 and is not intended to limit the rows 126, 128, 130 to anyparticular spatial arrangement or alignment.

An electrical control device 132, 134, 136 (e.g., a switch) may beelectrically coupled to each row 126, 128, 130 such that the associatedrow 126, 128, 130 may be selectively electrically coupled to aload/source in parallel or series with the other rows 126, 128, 130, orselectively electrically decoupled from the load vis-à-vis the otherrows 126, 128, 130 as desired.

For example, a fuel cell system may include three stacks of solid oxidefuel cells, each stack having 51 total individual cells, which may bedivided into three substacks, wherein each substack includes 17individual cells electrically coupled in series. One substack from eachstack may be electrically coupled, in series, to form three rows ofsubstacks, wherein each row of substacks includes an associatedelectrical control device.

Thus, an incoming fluid stream F may be divided into multiple incomingstreams F₁, F₂, F_(X), each of which may flow through an electrochemicalcell stack 102, 104, 106 by flowing through the associated substacks inseries (e.g., 112, 110 and 108; 118, 116 and 114; 124, 122 and 120) asshown by arrows A₁, A₂, A_(X), while each row 126, 128, 130 of substacksmay be electrically coupled to the load in parallel. The division of theincoming fluid stream F into equal or non-equal flows may be establishedthrough design of the stacks and substacks themselves, without relyingon active components. Furthermore, the power input or power output ofthe system 100, based on fuel cell operation or electrolyzer operation,may be varied by either electrically coupling or decoupling one or moreof the rows 126, 128, 130 of substacks 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118,120, 122, 124 from the load by way of the associated electrical switches132, 134, 136. The voltage input or voltage output of the system 100,based on fuel cell operation or electrolyzer operation, may also bevaried by modifying the electrical configuration of the rows 126, 128,130 from parallel to series operation by way of the associatedelectrical control devices 132, 134, 136.

Accordingly, the disclosed modularized electrochemical cell systems,including systems 10 and 100, provide for electrical switching ofsubstacks while maintaining a single fluid flow control point. The fluidflow through the substacks in series allows for more efficient operationover a larger power range because the fluid flow can be controlled froma single source based on the number of substacks operating. In currentdesigns, whole electrochemical cell stacks are deactivated resulting inthe need for fluid control hardware to individually isolate the stack(increasing complexity and decreasing reliability) or if the stack isnot individually isolated, the unreacted fluid flows through the stackwhich decreases efficiency of the system. Thus, the disclosedmodularized system can reduce the need for mechanical switches (e.g.,valves), and potentially eliminate the need for higher temperaturemechanical switches, for controlling fluid flow, which are generallymore expensive, bulky and less reliable than electrical switches.

Accordingly, the disclosed modularized electrochemical cell systems mayprovide for grouping of substacks in multiple configurations across someor all of the “rows” and stacks. The various substacks or groupings ofsubstacks can not only be activated and deactivated, but also modifiedto operate electrically in series or parallel, or groupings of seriesand parallel by means of the electrical control devices. Therefore, thesubstacks may be electrically coupled to the load in various ways formultiple power profiles depending on whether the system is in fuel cellmode or electrolysis mode, without the need for power converters.

For example, the system could operate in electrolysis mode with onlycertain rows of substacks (120, 122, 124) switched on initially, andturning on multiple rows as the input power increases, thereby allowingthe system to support a wide swing in input power while still operatingefficiently. The system efficiency may be increased by avoidingefficiency losses associated with deactivating and maintaining thermalcontrol of entire stacks or loss of reactants through non-operatingstacks.

Furthermore, the ability to use a single fluid flow may facilitatekeeping all of the electrochemical cells in the system warm even when aparticular cell or row of cells is in deactivated mode, without the needfor separate fluid flow controls. The ability to keep an off-mode cellwarm is particularly useful when the cells are temperature sensitive orrequire substantial warm-up time to achieve efficient operation, such assolid oxide fuel cells.

In one particular aspect, the disclosed systems may be used incombination with another energy system, wherein an alternative inputpower source (e.g., solar power) is used to run the system inelectrolysis mode when the alternative input power is available (e.g.,during the daylight) to produce hydrogen, which in turn is used to fuelthe system in fuel cell mode when the alternative power is not available(e.g., during the night). The disclosed systems may operate such totalenergy storage systems at a higher efficiency and higher reliability dueto the ability to quickly and efficiently respond to variable inputs(e.g., fluctuations in incoming solar energy).

Although various aspects of the disclosed modularized electrochemicalcell system have been shown and described, modifications may occur tothose skilled in the art upon reading the specification. The presentapplication includes such modifications and is limited only by the scopeof the claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. An electrochemical cell system comprising: aplurality of electrochemical cells arranged in an electrochemical cellstack, said electrochemical cell stack including a plurality ofsubstacks having at least a first substack and a second substack; and afirst electrical control device electrically coupled to a said firstsubstack of said plurality of substacks to selectively reconfigure saidfirst substack to operate electrically in series and in parallel withother substacks of said plurality of substacks.
 2. The system of claim 1wherein said substacks of said plurality of substacks are configuredsuch that fluid flows in series from substack to substack of saidplurality of substacks.
 3. The system of claim 1, further comprising asecond electrical control device electrically coupled to said secondsubstack of said plurality of substacks to selectively reconfigure saidsecond substack to operate electrically in series and in parallel withother substacks of said plurality of substacks, wherein said firstelectrical control device is controllable independently of said secondcontrol device to selectively electrically reconfigure said first andsaid second substacks.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein at least one ofsaid first substack and said second substack is selectivelyreconfigurable independently of said other substacks of said pluralityof substacks by said first electrical control device and said secondelectrical control device, respectively.
 5. The system of claim 3,wherein said first electrical control device is configured toselectively couple and decouple said first substack to a load or powersource, and wherein said second electrical control device is configuredto selectively couple and decouple said second substack to said load orpower source.
 6. The system of claim 3, wherein said first and secondelectrical control devices are configured to selectively electricallycouple said first and second substacks in series.
 7. The system of claim3, wherein said first and second electrical control devices areconfigured to selectively electrically couple said first and secondsubstacks in parallel.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein saidelectrochemical cells of said plurality of electrochemical cells arefuel cells.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein said electrochemical cellsof said plurality of electrochemical cells are electrolyzer cells. 10.The system of claim 1, wherein said electrochemical cells of saidplurality of electrochemical cells are configured to operate in bothfuel cell mode and electrolyzer mode.
 11. The system of claim 1, whereinsaid electrochemical cells of said plurality of electrochemical cellsare polymer exchange membrane cells.
 12. The system of claim 1, whereinsaid electrochemical cells of said plurality of electrochemical cellsare solid oxide fuel cells.
 13. The system of claim 1, wherein saidfirst electrical control device includes a first electrical switch. 14.The system of claim 1, further comprising a second electrochemical cellstack that includes a plurality of electrochemical cells arranged into aplurality of substacks, wherein fluid flows in series from substack tosubstack of said second electrochemical cell stack.
 15. The system ofclaim 14, wherein fluid flow through both said electrochemical cellstack and said second electrochemical cell stack is controlled at asingle flow control point.
 16. The system of claim 14, wherein saidfirst substack is electrically coupled with a first substack of saidsecond electrochemical cell stack, and wherein said second substack iselectrically coupled with a second substack of said secondelectrochemical cell stack.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein saidfirst and second electrical control devices selectively electricallyconfigure said first and second substacks of said electrochemical cellstack and said second electrochemical cell stack in at least one of aseries configuration, a parallel configuration and a disconnectedconfiguration.
 18. An electrochemical cell system comprising: at leasttwo electrochemical cell stacks, each of said electrochemical cellstacks including a plurality of electrochemical cells arranged into aplurality of substacks such that fluid flows in series from substack tosubstack of said plurality of substacks, wherein each substack of one ofsaid electrochemical cell stacks is electrically coupled with at leastone substack of the other of said electrochemical cell stacks to defineat least a first and a second row of substacks; and at least twoelectrical control devices, said two electrical control devices beingelectrically coupled to said first and second rows of substacks,respectively, to selectively and independently reconfigure said firstand second rows of substacks to operate electrically in series and inparallel with at least each other.